Friday, April 22, 2016

REVIEW: Sony a6300 with Sony 16-70mm f/4 Lens (Part II of II)–The Best Camera for Parents on a Budget

Sony Alpha a6300 Mirrorless Digital Camera
Sony Alpha a6300 Mirrorless Digital Camera

Click here to get it now via Amazon Prime

The Sony a6300 is an impressive camera, no doubt, which is why I couldn’t contain my praise in the first part of my review entitled REVIEW: Sony a6300 with Sony 16-70mm f/4 Lens (Part I of II)–The best Sony AF ever?.

The more I used it, the more I liked it. What’s more, my wife even started asking me if we could get one as she loved the size and performance. Given the great 4k video, it’s not out of the question that I might invest in one of these for my personal use as it is a heck of a lot of camera for this price.

Video Review

Here’s a short video that gives you some basics about what I like about this camera and shows off some of its cool features:

 

Video Sample

Despite my disdain for doing video, I couldn’t help but share at least one 4k video that gives you a basic idea of how good it is:


You must view full screen via here on a 4k display like the NEC PA322UHD to see the full 4k

Be sure to view the “stats for nerds” by right clicking on the video to ensure you are really seeing 4k – you may have to play it again to see the full 4k video.

Here’s a 4k frame grab from YouTube that illustrates what you should see if you are really viewing the 4k version:

image
Click the photo to see the full size 4k screen grab of the 4k video playback in YouTube

Bookshelf Test / ISO Performance


f/8 @ 70mm for 20 sec at ISO 100

Even up to f/8, the image quality is super sharp

100% View of f/8 using ISO 100
100% View  of shot above

Personally I found ISO 6400 to be my comfortable maximum ISO as shown here:

ISO 6400

Click here to view over 20 bookshelf shots that you can download and view in full resolution to see how this camera performs at various ISO’s and apertures.

The results here are definitely better than some lower end DSLR’s I’ve tested, so don’t let the small size fool you – this is a highly capable cameral for photographers of all skill levels.

Real World Shots

People don’t read manuals and they rarely take time to learn how to use their cameras, so when I test I like to have a combo of brain dead shooting (like many would do with cell phones) sprinkled with some serious shooting where I actually dial in all settings manually. This results in what I call real world shots because they are unplanned, unedited shots that just occur during the course of everyday life.

I hope you enjoy them compared to the heavily processed shots found elsewhere as they more closely represent what real people will really get out of this camera if they were to take it home and use it themselves.

The shots below and elsewhere in this article are completely unedited in-camera JPEG’s that feature camera defaults unless otherwise noted. These images may be viewed when reading this article, but you may not print, edit, modify, redistribute, etc… any of these images in any way. They are copyright Ron Martinsen – All Rights Reserved.

Click the photos to see full-size, unedited original in-camera JPEG’s.


f/4 @ 70mm for 1/250 sec at ISO 6400

Not too shabby for ISO 6400!!!


f/4 @ 70mm for 1/250 sec at ISO 400

While this may not have been the best lens, it still did a decent job and offered some respectable bokeh it was summoned such as was the case in this shot


f/4 @ 20mm for 1/200 sec at ISO 100

Kids don’t stay still, and Kai is no exception. I was happy with the face detection that still gave me a decent focus on the face even when Kai was totally random and unpredictable. I couldn’t have got this shot with most high end DSLR’s


f/4 @ 59mm for 1/400 sec at ISO 4000

I stuck my camera in a log and took a shot without even seeing where my son was. While this may not be the most perfect shot, I was impressed that it still came away with a relatively decent focus on the eye – especially since my Kai was running


f/4 @ 18mm for 1/250 sec at ISO 100

Lens flare is inevitable for a shot like this, but that green flare at the bottom was something I wish wouldn’t have happened. Perhaps a better lens like the Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM would have avoided doing that.


f/5.6 @ 70mm for 1/125 sec at ISO 125

My eyes couldn’t spot the two moose in the 9 o’clock position but fortunately the camera could and it got decent focus, so this was something that made my wife a fan of the AF system


f/4 @ 23mm for 1/1250 sec at ISO 1000

You won’t confuse this for the a7R Mark II when it comes to dynamic range, but its images will be better than you think on your display than they appear through the viewfinder LCD.


f/4 @ 70mm for 1/125 sec at ISO 800

The in-camera noise reduction smears textures too much, but this camera gets the shot and it’s RAW images give you the option to try using a third any noise reduction product like Noiseware


f/5.6 @ 70mm for 1/640 sec at ISO 100

Default in-camera processing with auto white balance is a little bland, but it often gets the shot that gives you something that will clean up nicely during the photo editing process


f/4 @ 70mm for 1/500 sec at ISO 125


f/4 @ 64mm for 1/500 sec at ISO 500

Look carefully at the tallest flower and you’ll notice some speck on it. If you zoom to 100% of the full-size file you’ll see that it’s actually a bug – that’s pretty decent resolution!


f/4 @ 61mm for 1/500 sec at ISO 200

Great sharpness on the subject and butter smooth bokeh elsewhere – you’ve gotta love it!


f/4 @ 56mm for 1/80 sec at ISO 1000

If your settings are dialed in properly, the built-in stabilization will increase your chances of a sharp shot even if you have a shaky hold like I do!


f/4 @ 70mm for 1/500 sec at ISO 320

Shooting into the sun with a dark subject, but the AF did great and the meter was spot on for an accurate exposure


f/4 @ 70mm for 1/500 sec at ISO 100

You sacrifice some sharpness for this bokeh as you can see in the f/5.6 shot


f/4 @ 70mm for 1/500 sec at ISO 200

Click here to get a full gallery of images taken while I was reviewing this camera..

Conclusion

With outstanding autofocus featuring brilliant eye tracking, excellent 4k video support, impressive burst mode speed and all the features any serious photographer would really want – this is a camera that I can easily give my highest recommendation.

Yes, this is a serious camera for serious pro photographers so if you can justify it then get even better results by skipping this lens in favor of the Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM Lens and go for the Zeiss Batis 18mm f/2.8 Lens if you need a pro quality wide angle lens.

Where to order

Click here to learn more or order at the B&H web site, or click here to buy it at Amazon.

Need to edit your photos?

Click here for info about the best free software on the web that used to cost over $800, but Google has made free.

Interested in something even better? Check out my What plug-ins should I buy? article.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity

2 comments:

ttan98 said...

Looks like you like and accept the performance of the Sony 16-70 mm f4 lens and it costs close to $1,000 and there are so many negative responses to this lens that I hesitate to purchase it. You see where I come from the buyer is not allowed to return the goods just because he/she does like the performance of the lens hence the decision not to purchase it. Looks like you purchased a lens which is acceptable to you hence go out and shoot and enjoy using it. Cheers.

ronmartblog.com said...

ttan98,

Yes, it is good but yes there are better options - for more money of course. No, I did not purchase it because I review a lot of products and can't afford to purchase everything that I like. If I were spending my own money I'd probably invest in the Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 G series Lens as I stated in the article.

Don't let internet trolls that love to whine discourage you from this lens. Look at the results of UNEDITED photos like those featured in this article (and my a6000 article) and ask yourself if you like the results.

Most camera stores will let you try out a lens in the store, and more countries are starting to offer lens rental services. If neither of these are available to you, then consider reaching out to a local photography group as someone is bound to have a Sony with this lens. Go with them on a photo walk or something and observe how the lens performs.

Ron